TALLAHASSEE – Attorney Common Ashley Moody’s place of work has urged the Florida Supreme Courtroom to reject a challenge to a point out law barring possession of guns by convicted felons.
In a 13-website page temporary, legal professionals in Moody’s place of work wrote that the U.S. Supreme Courtroom has “been apparent that longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons do not infringe the Second Amendment.”
An legal professional for convicted felon William Edenfield in August asked the Florida Supreme Court docket to take up a constitutional obstacle to the law. The ask for came following a three-decide panel of the 1st District Court of Charm in Could turned down Edenfield’s arguments, which targeted, in component, on a 2022 U.S. Supreme Court docket final decision in a circumstance recognized as New York State Rifle & Pistol Affiliation v. Bruen.
In that case, the U.S. Supreme Court required assessing gun limitations by no matter if they are steady with the nation’s “historic tradition of firearm regulation.”
Edenfield’s legal professional wrote that the 1st District Court of Attractiveness interpreted the Bruen choice to “study into the Next Modification a limitation to only ‘law-abiding, dependable citizens.’ This kind of a qualification is identified nowhere in the Next Amendment’s managing text. The district court cited pretty much no historic evidence in help of this limitation.”
But Moody’s office mentioned the Florida Supreme Court docket really should not take up Edenfield’s situation.
“Petitioner (Edenfield) cites no case in which a courtroom has held that a felon-dispossession legislation is facially unconstitutional beneath the Next Modification,” the state’s legal professionals wrote. “On the contrary, the courts overwhelmingly have upheld the validity of felon-dispossession legislation even right after Bruen.”
Thanks for reading CBS NEWS.
Create your free account or log in
for more features.
